🎉   Please check out our new website over at books-etc.com.

Seller
Your price
£95.77
RRP: £100.99
Save £5.22 (5%)
Printed on Demand
Dispatched within 7-9 working days.

Taming the Past

Essays on Law in History and History in Law. Studies in Legal History

By (author) Robert W. Gordon
Format: Hardback
Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Published: 9th Jun 2017
Dimensions: w 152mm h 229mm d 29mm
Weight: 815g
ISBN-10: 1107193230
ISBN-13: 9781107193239
Barcode No: 9781107193239
Trade or Institutional customer? Contact us about large order quotes.
Synopsis
Lawyers and judges often make arguments based on history - on the authority of precedent and original constitutional understandings. They argue both to preserve the inspirational, heroic past and to discard its darker pieces - such as feudalism and slavery, the tyranny of princes and priests, and the subordination of women. In doing so, lawyers tame the unruly, ugly, embarrassing elements of the past, smoothing them into reassuring tales of progress. In a series of essays and lectures written over forty years, Robert W. Gordon describes and analyses how lawyers approach the past and the strategies they use to recruit history for present use while erasing or keeping at bay its threatening or inconvenient aspects. Together, the corpus of work featured in Taming the Past offers an analysis of American law and society and its leading historians since 1900.

New & Used

Seller Information Condition Price
-New£95.77
+ FREE UK P & P

What Reviewers Are Saying

Submit your review
Newspapers & Magazines
'Robert W. Gordon has been one of the preeminent commentators on the rapid rise of American Legal History as a discipline. Each of these essays, written over the past forty years, constitutes an important example of his unequalled influence over the dramatic development of the field.' Morton Horwitz, Charles Warren Professor of American Legal History, Emeritus, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts 'The sparkling essays of one of the preeminent legal historians of our era are now collected in one place, where they can talk with each other. Here we see the vintage apercus that make us laugh aloud at Gordon's wit and nod our head at his wisdom. So, for example, we see Gordon discussing 'Willard Hurst's benign, if also rather insistent, influence;' talking about how 'dead paradigms ... never really get killed off [in law], but hang around and Dracula-like, rise from their coffins to stalk the earth;' observing that E. P. Thompson 'almost never (save when exposing an opponent as an ignorant twit) showed off how hard he had been working;' and pointing out that 'history does not make a good domestic pet.' This book is a real treat!' Laura Kalman, University of California, Santa Barbara 'Once an arcane backwater, mostly located in the backrooms of law schools, disconnected from the main themes of academic legal study, legal history has become a site of core controversies, ones that everyone involved with the study of law had to engage with. Legal history is where scholars from emerging fields of 'non-legal' history - including historical studies of gender, of race, and of market capitalism - found the scholarly perspectives that made possible exciting new work about law. The writings of Robert W. Gordon helped guide how it all happened. American scholarship owes him a debt of gratitude. And it is good that a new generation will be introduced to his analytic clarity, to his wisdom, and to his attractive voice, through this accessible edition.' Hendrik Hartog, Princeton University 'For four decades, Robert W. Gordon has provoked, inspired, and nourished the writing of critical legal histories. I can still recall the exhilaration of reading him as a student. This indispensable volume collects classics and little-known essays that will engage first-time and returning readers with unsettling questions about the ways we understand law's history and authority.' Reva Siegel, Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Professor, Yale Law School 'In this collection of his writings over a forty-year career, Gordon argues that lawyers and judges often make arguments based on history - on the authority of precedent and original constitutional understandings - both to preserve the inspirational, heroic past and to discard its darker pieces.' Howard S. Erlanger, Law & Social Inquiry