🎉   Please check out our new website over at books-etc.com.

Seller
Your price
£89.99
Out of Stock

Being Imprisoned

Punishment, Adaptation and Desistance. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology

By (author) M. Schinkel
Format: Hardback
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
Published: 15th Oct 2014
Dimensions: w 133mm h 223mm d 16mm
Weight: 355g
ISBN-10: 1137440821
ISBN-13: 9781137440822
Barcode No: 9781137440822
Trade or Institutional customer? Contact us about large order quotes.
Synopsis
Exploring the way in which criminal punishment is interpreted and narrated by offenders, this book examines the meaning offenders ascribe to their sentence and the consequences of this for future desistance.

New & Used

Seller Information Condition Price
-New
Out of Stock

What Reviewers Are Saying

Submit your review
Newspapers & Magazines
"It is a book about punishment, imprisonment, re-entry and desistance - and the interrelationships between. ... It is brilliantly written and painstakingly analytical. This book is a must read for undergraduate and postgraduate students, but also for academics, policy makers and practitioners." (Beth Weaver, European Journal of Probation, Vol. 7 (4), 2015)

'Prisons are meant to accomplish a remarkable amount from punishment to rehabilitation to resettlement even. Yet, oddly, we rarely seek to test these theories by listening to the understandings of prisoners themselves on the imprisonment experience. In this important new work, Marguerite Schinkel allows us an almost unprecedented insight into these perspectives and develops a new approach to understanding the effects of imprisonment.' - Shadd Maruna, Dean, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, USA



'A turning point for the scientific and legal study of imprisonment as punishment. Schinkel's research brings empirical depth to a field that has long theorized on the basis of the shallowest of understandings of how prison is experienced by those imprisoned and to a remarkable degree failed to question many of the premises thought to justify its routine imposition.' - Jonathan Simon, Berkeley Law, University of California, USA