🎉   Please check out our new website over at books-etc.com.

Seller
Your price
£37.23
RRP: £42.99
Save £5.76 (13%)
Printed on Demand
Dispatched within 7-9 working days.

Abortion and the Private Practice of Medicine

By (author) Jonathan B. Imber
Format: Paperback / softback
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc, New York, United States
Imprint: Routledge
Published: 30th Jan 2017
Dimensions: w 152mm h 229mm d 11mm
Weight: 281g
ISBN-10: 1412864216
ISBN-13: 9781412864213
Barcode No: 9781412864213
Trade or Institutional customer? Contact us about large order quotes.
Synopsis
Originally published in 1986, Abortion and the Private Practice of Medicine was the first book to look at abortion from the perspective of physicians in private practice. Jonathan B. Imber spent two years observing and interviewing all twenty-six of the obstetrician-gynecologists in "Daleton," a city that did not have an abortion clinic. The decision as to whether, when, and how to perform abortions was therefore essentially up to the individual doctor. Imber begins the volume with a historical survey of medical views on abortion and the medical profession's response to the legalization of abortion in the United States. Quoting extensively from his interviews, he looks at various characteristics of doctors that may affect their professional opinion on abortion: their age, gender, religious background, and length of residence in the community; the nature of their training and prior experience; and the setting of the practice (whether group or solo). Imber found that the physicians' reasons for agreeing or refusing to perform abortions revealed considerable differences of opinion about how they construe their responsibilities.

New & Used

Seller Information Condition Price
-New£37.23
+ FREE UK P & P

What Reviewers Are Saying

Submit your review
Newspapers & Magazines
"This powerfully analytic, insight-provoking account . . . gives us intimate access to what he terms the 'haunting ambivalence' with which these physicians think and feel about the procedure of abortion. Imber brilliantly shows the empirical and symbolic relationship between this particular 'doctor's dilemma,' and the current state of the 'cultural legacy' of the medical profession and the larger society of which it is a part."

-Renee C. Fox, University of Pennsylvania